Maamadurai Movie

by admin
  • Maa Madurai Cast & Crew - Get Tamil movie Maa Madurai cast and crew, star cast details and information. Meet Maa Madurai Tamil movie actor, actress, director, producer and singers.
  • Rajinimurugan is a 2016 Indian Tamil -language masala film written and directed by Ponram, and produced by director N. Lingusamy and N. Subash Chandra Bose under the banner Thirrupathi Brothers. This is the second directorial venture of Ponram, after Varuthapadaatha Valibar Sangam (2013).

Directed by Balaji Mohan. With Dhanush, Kreshna, Sai Pallavi, Varalaxmi Sarathkumar. Gangster Maari squares off against Beeja, a hardened criminal who considers himself to be the God of death.

< Talk:Madurai
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Archive 1Archive 2

maqbara.com

I have removed citations that use this website as a source. There are a couple of reasons for this:

  1. There is absolutely nothing on that website, or at WHOIS, to verify that it is the official site for the mosque. Indeed, as things stand it could just as easily have been published by myself (better by me, in fact, as the design is a bit 'bleurgh' !)
  2. Even if there was some means of verification, information such as this should surely be available from multiple independent sources, per WP:V and WP:RS. Reliance on the site, which someone has claimed in an edit summary is in fact official, is not a great way to substantiate the statements in question.

I would appreciate it if someone could find better sources. - Sitush (talk) 21:49, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Adding better sources. Amjath123 (talk) 10:32, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry but bizlist is not a better source. They mirror content from Wikipedia. We need a book. - Sitush (talk) 11:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Reverted as you requested.

Maamadurai Movie Comedy

1) maqbara.com is not a blog and that exclusively speaks about the mosque and maqbara complex. I guess it should be maintained by the mosque or maqbara or someone who is well aware of that. I guess we can't simply neglect taht as unreliable.2) I have read in books, but those doesn't bear a ISBN number. Of course, that are of very old edition that, they were published before ISBN was brought into effect. I think a book would not add value to wikipedia without the ISBN number.3) I can add a multimedia link about the mosque from a renowned state newspapaer. the audio in that says it being the 2nd oldest in Tamilnadu.4)indica.co.in is another i hvae added.you are comments are welcome. Amjath123 (talk) 11:48, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Pls go through this. http://books.google.co.in/books?id=Ovxq8enmRKUC&pg=PA52&dq=kazimar&hl=en&sa=X&ei=a3cNT5WgHsbRrQe8ufCqBA&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=kazimar&f=false— Preceding unsigned comment added by Amjath123 (talk • contribs) 11:53, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
A website does not have to be a blog to be unreliable/unauthoritative, and I am not too convinced about using news sources for this sort of information because they often just parrot whatever they are told. Your last link above seems to be a good one (being published by Routledge) & it says something slightly different. Let's see what else turns up. Thanks for your efforts. - Sitush (talk) 12:12, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
  • (Just passing through:) I agree with Sitush on the maqbara website. The book looks very useful. I have not looked at the other source mentioned here. Drmies (talk) 15:13, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I am planning to re work on the section gain. Its widely known and mostly written in the books (might not contain ISBN number) that it is the 2nd oldest mosque in tamil nadu.


Also, on what basis, maqbara.com site can't be taken here.? It cannot be unreliable just because a user says and the other agrees to that. Amjath123 (talk) 09:47, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Please read the first message in this thread. Please do not reinstate maqbara.com. Please do not reinstate the 'second oldest' statement unless you can support it with reliable sources. - Sitush (talk) 10:57, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Maamadurai Movie Download

Read that message. maqbara.com is good looking in its relaibility. No issues with the site. Amjath123 (talk) 10:11, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Well, if you think it looks good then I think you need to read WP:RS. No way is that site (in its current form) going in this article. - Sitush (talk) 10:15, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
@ Amjath, thanks for taking up and bringing in the book reference. @Sitush, Can you be more specific on how this site doesn't fit into that. As you mentioned early, like whois info showing a websolution company name, i am not seeing that to be the reason for disqualification with respect to WP:RS. Wasif (talk) 12:09, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, but is anyone reading what I write? See #2 of my original message, read WP:RS, WP:PRIMARY and WP:SPS ... and note that there is nothing on the website or at whois which indicates that the site is official. Give me a couple of hours and I'll create one showing that the mosque is the newest in India - and how could you possibly dispute it using the logic that appears to be de rigeuer here? If you can find a decent book (not Lonely Planet etc) that confirms the point then fine and good, otherwise we stick with what we have. - Sitush (talk) 12:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Give me a couple of hours and I'll create one showing that the mosque is the newest in India. is this ready.? Amjath123 (talk) 14:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Tamil in the lead

Hi,Went through the discussions in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics/Archive_48#Native_languages_in_lead.The discussion there is applicable only when there is a conflict of what langugae to be used and particularly for the Personalities and not for the cities. Moreover, we dont have any language conflict here and its not a wikipedia policy that mandates not to put lead. Wasif (talk) 11:36, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

The consensus was to remove Indic scripts from the lead agreed, but there were user who added Telugu, Kannada and malayalam to various articles including Chennai, Coimbatore, etc. Hence, it was removed. I think User:Sodabottle should comment here first. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:25, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
The consensus was to remove scripts from all India related articles irrespective of a conflict. Abhishek Talk 05:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
But it still remains in articles of movies. And in a related case, on Tamil Nadu. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:12, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Well mass removal was what the admin asked to avoid, maybe remove it in a span of 4–6 months since the consensus. As and when you come across an article you have never edited and see the scripts, you can just remove them. Abhishek Talk 05:18, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
The consensus was simply to remove scripts, nothing more, nothing less. The closing admin noted the consensus here. I think its in plain and simple English. 05:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
The fact that it still remains on many articles doesn't mean that the consensus is not clear; it means that we're just not removing them en masse. 05:34, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
@Wasif, Absolutely not. Nowhere was it mentioned that the RfC was applicable to only those articles which had conflicts. Those articles were simply used as examples to illustrate the problems with having them. 05:39, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
I see. As for Conflict of language. It's a very vaguely defined phrase. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:21, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Infobox Collage

Images used in the collage image of infobox seems to be old and dark by appearance. It need to be fixed and the credits of the collage photos must also be mentioned in source field to meet the image standards. It can also help avoid the ImageForDeletion tag in future. --Essaar (talk) 11:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Entertainment - Eco Park and festivals

  • Though there is a new proposal for another Eco park at Thirupparankundram, the one that exists now is at Tallakulam not in Thirupparankundran.
  • It is worth to mention the average visitors of the Eco Park, too.
  • Madurai is sometimes regarded as 'City of Festivals'. But it is not mentioned in the article. --Essaar (talk) 14:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

BEIC control

Aside from the ambiguous map on page 253 of Markovitz, I can find no support in that source for the statement that it was in 1801 that the British East India Company took direct control. The map refers to 1790 and 1801, and to annexation, but makes no mention of direct control. Can someone explain this, please? - Sitush (talk) 16:49, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

... and an explanation for the vague comment sourced to King, Anthony D. (2005), Buildings and Society: Essays on the Social Development of the Built Environment, Taylor & Francis e-library, ISBN0-203-48075-9 would also be appreciate. Since the British government devolved control to the EIC until post-1857, I am pretty sure that something is amiss in either the phrasing or the facts here. I cannot see the source at all - pesky GBooks - but would be delighted if the relevant pages could be made available for review. Ta. - Sitush (talk) 16:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

British census data

British census methods in India changed from one decade to the next, and often quite dramatically. Are we sure that the figures used in the table of historical population prior to independence are meaningful? Is it really a good idea to tabulate using several sources? - Sitush (talk) 17:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

removed pre-independence census. Ssriram mt (talk) 14:26, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Second-tier city

The concept of a 'second-tier' city is meaningless to most people outside India. Can it be linked to a suitable article? - Sitush (talk) 17:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

DoneSsriram mt (talk) 14:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Sfn citations

There are a lot of problems with the Sfn citations. Briefly, these comprise citations that seemingly have no source and sources that seemingly are not cited. I think that in most cases the problem is likely to be that they have no been linked correctly. Regardless, this is a GA and it is not acceptable. I have simply deleted most of them but some remain due to lack of time. I hope that someone can sort out the mess but if not then I'll re-read the Sfn documentation and have a go myself. - Sitush (talk) 20:49, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

BTW, User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js is a useful tool for finding these type of errors. - Sitush (talk) 20:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Done— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssriram mt (talk • contribs) 14:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Maamadurai MovieMovie

District vs City

Why are we saying

With the advent of Small Scale Industries (SSI) after 1991, the industrialization of Madurai developed employment in the sector across the district from 63,271 in 1992–93 to 166,121 persons in 2001–02.[119] By the latter point, 28 per cent of the SSIs were textile-based, 22.9 per cent were building-based, 18.1 per cent were food-based and 10.4 per cent were electric-based.[119][120]

?

The figures are for the district, which has its own article. I realise that we do use the word 'district' in the statements but it is confusing and inappropriate. I very nearly removed it but thought I'd see it someone can find figures for the city (my view of the source on GBooks is restricted). - Sitush (talk) 16:13, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Good catch - i was finding it odd while writing. I have removed the numbers, which are relevant to the district.Ssriram mt (talk) 14:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Independence activists

Maamadurai Movie Songs Download

One trait common to Indian place articles - even down at village level - is to name-drop some independence activists/freedom fighters. I can understand the temptation to do so but unless the named people are notable in their own right (and thus can be blue-linked) then they have no place in any Wikipedia article. There are literally hundreds of such people who are blue-linked, but N. M. R. Subbaraman and Mohammad Ismail Sahib are not and they appear only to get passing mentions in the cited sources. It is trivia and it should be binned. - Sitush (talk) 17:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

They are quite notable, just that wiki doesnt have article in their names. Mohammad Ismail Sahib conceived the Muslim League party. Leaving prime leaders, all these leaders get only passing mention in English sources. We cannot expect to have Tilaks and Gandhis in all the towns. Ssriram mt (talk) 14:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
I have also added about temple entry movement, which is a historic one. Ssriram mt (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssriram mt (talk • contribs) 02:37, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Continuous habitation

Surely there must be an English language source for 'Madurai has been a major settlement for two millennia and is one of the oldest continuously inhabited cities in the world with a recorded history from 3rd century BC.[3]'? Dinamalar is currently used and I am not even sure that it really cuts the mustard on the reliability front. I am also curious regarding when it became a city, rather than a settlement: are we in danger of mixing apples and oranges? - Sitush (talk) 20:11, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Done. Ssriram mt (talk) 02:52, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

GAR

This is advance warning: this article is poor and should never have been awarded GA in its then form. Since no-one with access to the sources etc seems to be prepared to fix it, I will be seeking a delisting. - Sitush (talk) 19:37, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Somehow the talk is off my watchlist. I have removed redlinks and also will work on to remove puppets. Ssriram mt (talk) 23:02, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
I came here from the List of Oldest Inhabited Cities. The claim that it is one of the world's oldest inhabited cities in the world seems to have been based ona Wikipedia republisher's book and said oldest in India. One of the other 2 sources was a Wikipedia article, the other a travel book. Please folks, when you vet for GA vet the sources against our criteria, make sure there are page numbers for books, etc - maybe even check them? Dougweller (talk) 15:21, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
The citations are fixed. Ssriram mt (talk) 03:11, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Maamadurai Potruvom

Hi,The article Maamadurai Potruvom about the recent meet held in Madurai to celebrate the heritage of madurai is with less or No information. please contribute to improve the article. Wasif (talk) 06:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

citations/clarifications

There are quite some that have been noted. I will fix it over the weekend and request a lock. The blanks are induced by the refs removed earlier. Some puppet edits add to the cause and somehow sneak in to degrade the overall quality. Ssriram mt (talk) 04:50, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

These are fixed. Some of the edits were plain vanilla and could have been accomplished by simple edits, rather than crowding the article with CN template.Ssriram mt (talk) 16:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
No, they are not. And sniping at me will achieve nothing. I've said it before and I say it again: this is not a GA quality article yet. There still remain, for example, too many unsourced statements, too many misrepresentations of sources (I've just fixed one) and too many unexplained gaps. - Sitush (talk) 17:17, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
I have nominated the article for GOCE and will add references on the missing pieces. Nothing personal here, but edits are easy compared to review templates/comments.Ssriram mt (talk) 02:58, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Is second largest municipal corporation of Tamil Nadu?

Hello, Please provide a source for the statement 'Madurai is the second largest municipal corporation of Tamil Nadu' in the introductory paragraph of this article. The citation provided near to the statement does not has any proof for this statement. Thanks. Mmahesh207 (talk) 11:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Population

MADURAI METRO POPULATION IS NEARLY 2012000 BUT CITY POPULATION IS ONLY 1240000..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Gray (talk • contribs) 15:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Madurai

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Madurai's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named 'ua_2011':

  • From Coimbatore: 'Major Agglomerations'(PDF). The Registrar General & Census Commissioner, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. 2011. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  • From Bangalore: 'Urban agglomerations/cities having population 1 million and above'(PDF). Provisional population totals, census of India 2011. Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. 2011. Retrieved 26 January 2012.
  • From Tiruchirappalli: 'Major Agglomerations'(PDF). The Registrar General & Census Commissioner, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Retrieved 30 January 2014.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 05:17, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Could you please specify the references which you found to be orphaned? so that i could look into for the correct versions. Wasif (talk) 13:39, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Madurai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

  • Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.imdpune.gov.in/Temp_Extremes/histext2010.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

As of February 2018, 'External links modified' talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these 'External links modified' talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}}(last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:12, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Madurai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160315050316/http://www.censusindia.gov.in/DigitalLibrary/MFTableSeries.aspx to http://www.censusindia.gov.in/DigitalLibrary/MFTableSeries.aspx
  • Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.imdpune.gov.in/Temp_Extremes/histext2010.pdf
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121106103849/http://www.tn.gov.in/cma/chart5.htm to http://www.tn.gov.in/cma/chart5.htm
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121016045943/http://www.windpro.org/pdf/MISC/TNEB%20Address.pdf to http://www.windpro.org/pdf/MISC/TNEB%20Address.pdf
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718175926/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1980/Vol_I_LS_80.pdf to http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1980/Vol_I_LS_80.pdf
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131006234417/http://www.assembly.tn.gov.in/members/constnamewise.htm to http://www.assembly.tn.gov.in/members/constnamewise.htm
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081031131000/http://archive.eci.gov.in/se2001/background/S22/TN_ACPC.pdf to http://archive.eci.gov.in/se2001/background/S22/TN_ACPC.pdf
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110217153857/http://census2001.tn.nic.in/pca2001.aspx to http://census2001.tn.nic.in/pca2001.aspx
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120305140514/http://census2001.tn.nic.in/religion.aspx to http://census2001.tn.nic.in/religion.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, 'External links modified' talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these 'External links modified' talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}}(last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug) 04:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Madurai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

  • Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.censusindia.gov.in/pca/SearchDetails.aspx?Id=697001
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070204070855/http://www.bsnl.co.in/service/broadband_list_of_cities.pdf to http://www.bsnl.co.in/service/broadband_list_of_cities.pdf
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121022054112/http://www.ddinews.gov.in/DTH/Dealers/TamilNadu.htm to http://www.ddinews.gov.in/DTH/Dealers/TamilNadu.htm
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120625044538/http://www.mkuniversity.org/menu_pg.php?id=44%3Fs_id%3D44 to http://www.mkuniversity.org/menu_pg.php?id=44%3Fs_id%3D44
Maa madurai movie

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, 'External links modified' talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these 'External links modified' talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}}(last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug) 00:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Origin of Name

Enthusiasm should not lead to distortion of history. Madurai was always known as Madhura. It was Tamilized as Madurai. It is preposterous to claim that the name evolved from Marudhai.

  • Any idea if the Madurai bench is a circuit bench or a permanent bench? -- Sundar (talk·contribs) 06:35, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
As far as my knowledge goes, it's a permanent bench. Refer to http://www.tn.gov.in/policynotes/admn_of_justice.htm. But I'm still not sure of the number of districts under Madurai jurisdiction.. 12, 14 or 16? ~elviajero (talk·contribs)

Per this it is 12. Also, the jurisdiction question is interesting. Because, by virtue of being benches of the high court both the Chennai bench and Madurai bench must have jurisdiction all over Tamil nadu. But, the registry will take care that the cases from these regions alone are posted to the Madurai bench. So, perhaps an emergency case may be taken up by either bench. -- Sundar (talk·contribs) 04:44, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)

Update. Per this it is 13. -- Sundar (talk·contribs) 04:50, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)

Sundar,

Maamadurai full movie

Appreciating your contributions. Good work.

//Madurai was always known as Madhura//

Maamadurai Movie

//preposterous to claim that the name evolved from Marudhai//

Nobody knows about the exact reason for the name 'Madurai' as it is not a recently-built city.

Even before 2500 years, madurai was mentioned in literatures.( It could have been someother madurai near seashore. )

We can include about the Old Madurai also, Which hosted Mudal, Irandam Thamizh sangams. References are there in Sangam Literatures. Thanking you once again.

--Sathish

It was never Madhura. It was always Madurai. This is an ancient city linked to civilization. It has been Madurai since then. Howcome, someone is claiming it to be Madhura? Don't mix up Madhura with Madurai. Madurai has always been Madurai.

By the way, what is there to Tamilize a city in Tamil Nadu?

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.145.159.116 (talk) 10:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


I have read on some webpages (unfortunately i forgot which ones, since i didn't know, that i will need that info later) that the name 'Madurai' is coming from 'Madura' or 'Madhura', and this again originates from 'Mathura', the North-Indian birthplace of Lord Krishna, but tamilized. Which means that the city is using this very holy name, which would make perfect sense to me. Which Hindu would not appreciate living in the city of Krishna? The same was done with other names, like Ganga or Brahma, so why not with Mathura? Nobody ever heard of that story here? --91.64.85.115 (talk) 14:21, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Madurai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120129082955/http://www.aai.aero/allAirports/madurai_airpo_gi.jsp to http://www.aai.aero/allAirports/madurai_airpo_gi.jsp
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924145834/http://www.censusindia.gov.in/pca/SearchDetails.aspx?Id=697001 to http://www.censusindia.gov.in/pca/SearchDetails.aspx?Id=697001
  • Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.imdpune.gov.in/Temp_Extremes/histext2010.pdf
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120702033908/http://dailythanthi.com/sub.asp to http://www.dailythanthi.com/sub.asp
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130518082623/http://www.aai.aero/traffic_news/mar2k12annex4.pdf to http://www.aai.aero/traffic_news/mar2k12annex4.pdf
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130518081740/http://www.aai.aero/traffic_news/mar2k12annex3.pdf to http://www.aai.aero/traffic_news/mar2k12annex3.pdf
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120420202935/http://jnnurm.nic.in/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Brochures_Published_Madurai.pdf to http://jnnurm.nic.in/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Brochures_Published_Madurai.pdf
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120129082955/http://www.aai.aero/allAirports/madurai_airpo_gi.jsp to http://www.aai.aero/allAirports/madurai_airpo_gi.jsp
  • Added archive https://archive.is/20121129154436/http://203.101.40.168/newmducorp/citizencharter.htm to http://203.101.40.168/newmducorp/citizencharter.htm
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120101091613/http://www.mkuniversity.org/menu_pg.php?id=44%3Fs_id%3D44 to http://www.mkuniversity.org/menu_pg.php?id=44%3Fs_id%3D44
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150312214454/http://www.aai.aero/traffic_news/traffic_news_2015.jsp to http://www.aai.aero/traffic_news/traffic_news_2015.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, 'External links modified' talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these 'External links modified' talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}}(last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug) 03:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Madurai/Archive_2&oldid=921309481'
Show All Results...
  • Tracks
  • Artists
  • Albums
Maamadurai (2007)
Music Director
Karthik Raja
Actors
Karthik, Mithuna, Vadivelu
Producer
Mohan Raj
Director
Krishnan KK

About this album

KK Krishnan's Maamadurai featuring Karthik, Mithuna and Vadivelu is produced by Mohan Raj. Karthik Raja arranges for the soundtrack that includes five impressive songs.

Tracks

Adakkivasi Adakkivasi
Askalakale Askalakale
Singers
Selva, Vaasu, Naveen, Malgudi Subha, Ranjith, Kannan
Koondukal Poonathu Netrodu
Madurai Maduraithan
Singers
Reeta, Naveen, Ilaiyaraaja, Sangeetha, Piji, Vaasu, Rakul
Sorkam Arukile